I appreciate the sentiment behind this ill-named bill, but really, there is no 'there' there.
We'd all like to see new diplomatic presences spring up overnight in all those little Pacific islands. How else could we counter the malign influences of what I like to call the ChiComs?
But a serious legislative initiative requires some substance, and this bill is all wishful thinking.
From the bill's text:
The Embassy in a Box Act:
Requires the State Department to develop an “embassy in a box concept” that provides expedited procedures and physical resources needed to stand up new diplomatic missions overseas.
Requires the secretary of State to issue guidance so the Department can build new embassies more quickly and save taxpayer dollars.
So then, the bill requires the SecState to figure out what the hell Senator Risch means by an "Embassy in a Box" and then use a magic wand to dispel all the realities of limited resources and even more limited physical infrastructure on those tiny islands that the bill describes as "austere locations."
Apparently, the catchphrase "Embassy in a Box" is supposed to bridge the gap between our wish and our reality.
From my own simple point of view, I'd rather focus on creating a "Box In an Embassy" on the assumption that our staffers may need a safe place to ride out any local Tong Wars. This
kind of thing, for example.
Good luck, Senator, but I think this is the kind of bill that doesn't survive contact with reality.